Dr. Logan’s Health Evaluation Program

We are in an era of depending more and more upon our own abilities to make decisions.
Dr. Logan’s Health Evaluation Program is designed to aid in doing this. We need to understand
some aspects of how our bodies function, of agriculture and food processing, and of our
economic structure.
Our goal is to use naturally grown foods as much as possible. If we need food
supplements, we need to know how to read labels to make the best decisions. Contributing to
our health concerns are poor agricultural practices such as the use of artificial fertilizers, GMO
grains, (which are showing more and more to not be healthy for us, or for our livestock), and
poor laws governing them. Because of this, we may need quality food supplements, at least for
awhile to help build up our health.
Because everyone is different, there is no one diet that fits all. One way to help to
determine what foods are best to use, we need to understand how our body handles certain foods.
For example, some people do better with proteins and quality fats, whereas others do better with
more complex carbohydrates. This is what metabolic typing is about. When this is determined,
it means saving on foods and supplements because the diet can be more specific for the person.
With toxins being a concern, we need to consider ways to determine what toxins we may
have and how to deal with these. A special urine test and hair mineral analysis are two ways to
look at this.
We have done research to help with these concerns so that the patient can get the most
information for a reasonable cost.
We hope to have at least part of this available online to further make this practical for
many people.
The Program:
• General Medical History Questionnaire
• System Survey Questionnaire
• Metabolic Typing Questionnaire (newly simplified)
• Analysis Options
Special Urine Testing (aids in toxin load handling and metabolic pathway functions)
Hair Mineral Analysis (gives added information on fast and slow oxidizers, that is related to metabolic
typing)
Blood Analysis (routine or for specific needs)
• Some Treatment Options
Lifestyle nutritional and diet consulting
Injection therapy (nutritional, hormonal, etc)
BioPhoton™ therapy
Referral for specific chiropractic and/or massage therapy, and specialized medical

For anyone truly wanting to know the researched truth above vaccines from a well qualified physician, here is an excellent site. It is a bit long but well worth looking at.

This book stems from the early death of Colin Campbell’s father in Virginia who died of a massive heart attack at age 70 after having his first heart attack at age 62 on their farm. Campbell decided to study why people, especially in America, were so unhealthy. This led to studies in the Philippines and eventually into China.

The book is well supported by statistical data (not saying it is always interpreted accurately).

Discussed is the so-called high correlation between high cholesterol and heart attacks. Even mentioned is the famous Framingham study which, according to him, “clearly” relates high cholesterol to heart attacks. Higher amounts of meat was clearly related to more health problems including cancer. Aflatoxins (as from peanuts) was discussed in relationship to cancer in the Philippines – a good study.

He did mention the importance of vitamin D.

He recognized the political aspects of medicine, the biased funding, etc.

Comments:
Though the book was published in 2006, it looks more like it came out of the early 1970s or thereabouts.

Not one word was mentioned about quality fats, omega-3s and related fats, all of which have been well researched. Now we know that grass-fed beef (and other livestock) is higher in omega-3s. In all likelihood the data he presented are based upon poor quality fats. Indeed the quality of the protein is also likely based upon poorer quality. He fails to mention the detrimental effects of soy protein (soy in general).

Newer interpretation of the Framingham study has indicated that cholesterol was not closely related to the incidence of heart attacks, plus lifestyle indices such as smoking was not originally considered. Other studies also show this, and indeed cholesterol in the 150 range seems more harmful than that of around 200.

He obviously does not understand the difference between synthetic vitamins and natural vitamins.

He cuts down the late Dr. Atkins, and boosts up Dr. Ornish. The former is of protein/fat fame, while the latter is of carbohydrate (and low protein/fat) fame. Dr. Ornish wrote approving comments in Campbell’s book. So who is right? They both are when considering Metabolic Type testing (which I do).

In summary, the book is a massive and commendable study into health, but remains outdated in current interpretation, thus it only serves as a stepping stone rightfully fitted into the 1970s era.